Over the last year or so across the state, governmental agencies have been mailing bills to those who receive a governmental response to a crime. The response can be in the form of police officers, CHP officers and / or firemen. Our clients have called us up, asking if they should pay the bill, try to negotiate something or if the bill can be converted to community service. After all, the bills are often over $1,000.
We tell our clients to read the written advisory that accompanied the notice. Pay close attention to the deadlines specified and the format required for an appeal. The advisory should identify the statutory (or administrative regulation) basis for the claim for costs reimbursement and it should also provide a full statement of your rights to challenge or appeal the claim and the amount.About This Article Briefly: If you receive a bill from the CHP or any other government agency after a DUI or other crime, we recommend you simply pay it because fighting it can take a lot of time. A few of our clients have fought the bill and regretted doing so due to the time required. Hiring an attorney to contest the bill is probably not cost-effective unless the bill is over $10,000.
Moreover, there are some recent cases that suggest a bill cannot be mailed for something that was not an accident. In CHP v. Sup Ct (Allende) (2006) 135 C.A.4th 488, the court held that a DUI arrest is not an accident sufficient to justify an order for reimbursement of agency or municipality costs. The court said that the term “accident” necessarily means “something more than the negligent operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant."
In many cases, the result of an appeal of the costs claimed will result in a substantial reduction in the amount ordered. The appeals process is short and procedurally challenging, and you are entitled to counsel. Be sure that you meet all specified deadlines for appealing. If you miss the deadline, you will lose your right to contest the imposition of costs against you and/or the amount of the order for reimbursement.
The bottom line is that if someone wants to challenge such a “bill,” that person should pay close attention to the appeal process and follow the guidelines. Hiring an attorney to guide one through the appeal may, however, prove more costly than the reduction in the bill, making the attorney cost impractical. We recommend therefore that one only hire counsel to challenge an extremely large bill. Small bills, while perhaps inflated, should probably just be paid unless one has the time, energy and motivation to fight long and hard for perhaps only a $100 reduction.
For more information about post-conviction financial issues, click on the following articles:
Restitution Award of $3.4 Million Vacated Against Possessor of Child Pornography
In Juvenile Vandalism Case Involving Graffiti, Restitution Cannot Include Investigation Costs