What Is the Law on Vaping by Juveniles? Punishment?
You may have seen high school students appearing to suck on a cylindrical item that appears like a small flashlight or large pen. Often, this is even done by juvenile high students. This is “vaping,” a new form of an electronic cigarette that delivers a potent vaporized or aerosolized form of nicotine, far stronger than traditional cigarettes.
It is currently quite popular among both juveniles and adults because many believe, incorrectly, that it is not as dangerous as traditional smoking. It is also popular because there is no cloud of smoke or smell of cigarette smoke and many vaping companies sell a wide variety of flavors for such devices, many which appear to target those under 21.
Brief Synopsis: “Vaping” is illegal for a juvenile (and adult) in many areas one may not consider illegal, i.e. in cars with other minors (under 18), within 25 feet of a school playground or within 250 feet of a youth sporting event, among other places listed in this article.
Electronic cigarettes are considered a tobacco product under California Business & Professions Code § 22950.5(d)(1)(B) and California Health & Safety Code § 104495(8)(A). Under 22950.5(d)(1)(B), a tobacco product is defined as “a product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption [including] an electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including, but not limited to, an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah. . . "
As a tobacco product, sales of such devices to anyone under 21 is strictly prohibited (under 21, but over 18 is permissible if one is active duty military). California Business & Professions Code §§ 22958(a) and 22963(a), as well as Penal Code § 308(A)(1)(a).
Clara Shortridge Foltz CCBPossession of a vaping device by a juvenile is not a crime in itself, but using the device is when it becomes a crime. Under California Business & Professions Code § 22950.5(c), use of vaping devices is prohibited wherever smoking is prohibited.
This includes, for both adults and juveniles:
- place of employment (California Labor Code § 6404.5);
- health facilities (California Health & Safety Code § 1286);
- in outpatient health facilities (California Health & Safety Code § 1234);
- day care facilities (California Health & Safety Code § 1596.795);
- in nonprofit charitable temporary food facilities (California Health & Safety Code § 114332. 3(f);
- within 25 feet of the “commerce area” of a certified farmers’ market (California Health & Safety Code § 11437(f));
- in cars with other minors (California Health & Safety Code § 118948);
- on grounds operated by the California Youth Authority, with the exception of residential housing for staff where inmates are not present (California Welfare & Institutions Code § 1712.5);
- in a public transportation vehicle such as a bus or train (California Health & Safety Code § 118925);
- on passenger utilities, such as a commercial aircraft, a Greyhound bus or Amtrak train (California Public Utility Code § 561(a));
- within 25 feet of a school playground (Health & Safety Code § 104495(b);
- within 250 feet of a youth sporting event (California Health & Safety Code § 104495(d)); and
- inside public buildings or “within twenty feet of a main exit, entrance or operable window of a public building or in a state-owned passenger vehicle (California Government Code § 7597(a)).
In addition, the landlord of a residential dwelling unit may prohibit smoking of tobacco products, including the use of vaping devices, on the property or in any portion of the building (California Civil Code § 1947.5).
In other words, use a vaping device, particularly by a juvenile is severely restricted. The penalties for the use of such a device will vary based on the violation, i.e. whether it is first-time offense or not, the age of the offender, the nature of the offense (vaping in a car with children or outside a day-care facility is perhaps worse than other violations) and the judge involved.
Our office has not yet seen anyone prosecuted in court for violation of the new vaping laws, but there certainly will be such cases with time.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well." S.A., Torrance
★★★★★
"Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him." S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
"Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards." L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
"Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help." V.L., Carson
★★★★★
"Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot." C.R., Pomona