Pasadena, Theft of iPads From Toys 'R Us, Formal Probation

Our clients, ages 29 and 23, were arrested for allegedly stealing seven I-Pads, one at a time, from five different “Big Box” retailers.  The boyfriend and girlfriend allegedly would buy an I-pad in cash, take it home, carefully open the box, take the I-Pad out, then replace it with paper items to equal the original box weight.  The older client, a man, used a digital scale to make sure the weight was exactly the same.  Using a plastic wrap machine at his house, he would then seal the box perfectly with heat.

In 50 Words or Less:  Pasadena, clients  arrested for scheme of buying I-Pads and returning empty boxes, weighing the same, receiving cash refund at five different stores, face 15 years in state prison, resolved no prison.

The couple would then return the items to the store and seek a cash refund.  Our clients had selected certain stores for this return policy because no identification was required – just a receipt was necessary.  The older client would then sell the I-Pads on E-bay for about $500 each.
 
As the stores discovered the empty I-Pad boxes, they tried to retrace the return of the specific boxes via their store security cameras.  Over and over, they identified our clients, who often came to the stores together and left together.


Both clients were ironically employed within the legal industry in jobs that certainly were put in jeopardy by their mere arrest.  Police had investigated our clients for several months and had difficulty assembling the facts, so when our older client admitted to the conduct in detail, the suspicions of the police were validated.  Neither client had any prior criminal history.

At the felony arraignment in Pasadena Superior Court, the district attorney was quite angry with our clients.  She did not dare read the nearly 200 page police report, which was complete with receipts from the various stores and video stills.  It was difficult to read and disorganized. 

The initial offer was two years in state prison for each client, plus restitution, which was expected to be about $4,600.  Our younger client, not a U.S. Citizen, was concerned with being subject to deportation proceedings and being forced to return to China.  Our older client, while a U.S. Citizen, was worried about losing his job, where he had worked for eight years.

Greg then methodically looked through the police report, taking six hours to carefully verify that each charge was accurately alleged and supported with documentation.  As he conducted this review, he discovered that the reporting party, the store manager, had jumbled his facts and missed much of the documentation that one would expect such a big box store to have available.

Greg thus wrote an eight page Defense Position Letter, explaining to the prosecutor the problems of proof and pointing out how the key prosecution witness was obviously quite confused.  Greg also showed her that the retailer had mistakenly identified our clients as another Chinese couple who was clearly at least ten years older and looked quite distinguishable from our clients.

The prosecutor read the letter and panicked, realizing she would have to spend a lot of time to prepare for the preliminary hearing and with her key witness.  She cut the deal in half to one year in a desperate attempt to avoid the work.
 
Pasadena Courthouse